 |
 |
ARE YOU DOING
BUSINESS IN THE UNITED STATES?

It is possible that your business or
your corporation may have U.S. tax filing requirements or even U.S. income tax
liabilities if you have U.S. customers. Determining the U.S. tax status of your
Canadian business is important in order to avoid penalties and inadvertent tax
consequences. We will briefly guide you through some tax considerations for
carrying on business in the United States.
The United States taxes non-resident individuals and foreign corporations based on
U.S. business profits and U.S. source non-business income (income from interest,
dividends, and royalties). We will deal here with U.S. business profits.
Effectively Connected Income
A non-resident individual or a foreign corporation that is engaged in a U.S. trade
or business must report and pay tax based on the net amount of U.S. source income
effectively connected with the U.S. trade or business.
A trade or business is not clearly defined in the Internal Revenue Code or its
regulations. Instead, the courts have relied on regular and continuous activity
based on a facts and circumstances analysis. You may have a trade or business in
the U.S. under the following circumstances:
- Your are making sales into the
U.S. to U.S. customers.
- You are shipping goods to the
U.S. with title passing at the customer’s premises after inspection.
- Your employees are regularly
travelling to the U.S. on sales calls or are regularly present at U.S. trade shows
carrying out demonstrations and marketing activities.
- Your employees are travelling
to the U.S. to install and service your products.
- You are performing personal
services in the U.S. carrying out consulting activities.
Effectively connected income is subject to tax in the U.S. at graduated rates
(the average rate of federal and state tax is a combined 39%).
The Treaty
Fortunately, as a resident of Canada, a corporation is not subject to tax on U.S.
effectively connected income unless that income is earned through a U.S. permanent
establishment. This relief from U.S. taxation is provided pursuant to the Canada /
U.S. Income Tax Convention (“the Treaty”). Examples of situations where a
corporation may be considered to have a permanent establishment in the U.S. include
where the corporation has:
- an office,
- a factory,
- an employee in the U.S. who
has the ability to conclude contracts.
It is in the latter situation where many Canadian corporations are likely open to
U.S. taxation. In many small corporate scenarios, the principals, i.e. the president,
vice president, key shareholders are the individuals that are travelling to the U.S.
to conduct sales meetings and “clinch the deal”. In almost all situations, these
individuals have the ability and authority to conclude the contract. Where this is
carried out in the U.S., the IRS will view the Canadian corporation to have earned
the income through a U.S. permanent establishment. Where a corporation has engaged
an independent contractor to conduct its business, it will generally not have a
permanent establishment in the U.S. as long as the independent contractor is acting
in the ordinary course of their own business. The IRS may scrutinize the
relationship, however, to determine whether the independent contractor is in fact an
employee of the corporation. They will look at the amount of control exercised over
the agent, who bears the risk of loss, and other tests of economic independence.
Note that where a corporation does not have a permanent establishment but it does
have income effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, it will have U.S.
filing requirements. The corporation must file a U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign
Corporation with Treaty disclosure to claim the Treaty exemption. If the corporation
does not file these forms, and it is later found that the income was earned though a
U.S. permanent establishment, the corporation will be taxed on its gross income
(rather than being allowed the related deductions). If the Treaty exemption is
claimed after the fact, a $10,000 penalty for non-disclosure of a Treaty position
can be assessed for each item of income.
Filing these forms does not get the corporation “off the hook” with respect to U.S.
tax. The IRS may still challenge the existence of a U.S. permanent establishment.
If the IRS is successful, the Canadian corporation will be subject to the full U.S.
tax regime on U.S. business profits. Luckily, a foreign tax credit can be claimed in
Canada to the extent that the Canadian corporation paid Canadian tax on those profits.
If, however, the U.S. federal and state tax on the income is higher than the Canadian
tax on the same income, it will not be possible to obtain a full credit for the U.S.
taxes paid. At present, the average combined U.S. and state tax rate exceeds the
average combined Canadian federal and provincial tax rate.
There is a myriad of other issues to consider including state income and sales tax
implications. Remember there are 50 states out there, each with their own rules!
The above comments deal with federal issues only – the states are not bound by the
federal guidelines.
In conclusion:
- If you believe your corporation
is not engaged in a U.S. trade or business you do not have to file a U.S. federal tax return.
- If you have determined that
you are engaged in a U.S. trade or business but do not believe you have a permanent
establishment in the United States, you must file a U.S. federal tax return and
claim the exemption under the Treaty.
- Finally, if you are engaged in
a U.S. trade or business through a U.S. permanent establishment, your corporation
will be subject to U.S. federal and state tax related to that income. You will need
to determine what income and expenses are effectively connected with the permanent
establishment and file all relevant tax returns.
The following diagram offers a simplified overview of the federal rules:

"Information contained herein is of a general nature.
No action should be taken without seeking professional advice that takes
into account current developments and the specific facts of a particular
situation."
[Updated - February 20, 2010]
|